Service Quality Analysis of Business Licensing Information System (BLIS) at the Provincial Industry Department Using Decision Tree

Authors

  • Indah Pratiwi Putri Universitas Indo Global Mandiri
  • Dona Marcelina
  • Evi Yulianti
  • Arum Adisha Putra Anandez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62123/aqila.v1i2.48

Keywords:

Quality of service, Decision tree, System efficiency, Customer satisfaction, Business licensing

Abstract

In the digital era, government services, particularly business licensing, are expected to be efficient, reliable, and user- friendly to meet public demands. The South Sumatra Provincial Industry Department has adopted a web-based Business Licensing Information System to facilitate the licensing process. However, the system’s effectiveness in delivering quality service and ensuring process efficiency remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the service quality of the system, focusing on factors such as reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and usability. Using decision tree analysis, the study identifies the key variables impacting user satisfaction and process efficiency. The research objectives include assessing the overall quality of the service, analysing factors influencing efficiency, and providing recommendations for system improvement. Data will be gathered from business users who have utilized the system within the past year. The study scope encompasses service quality dimensions, process efficiency indicators, and user satisfaction metrics. Decision tree analysis will be employed to analyse these variables, highlighting the most influential factors on system performance. This research is expected to provide insights for enhancing the system’s reliability and usability, offering data-driven recommendations for decision-makers at the Industry Department. By improving the system, users can experience a more streamlined and satisfying licensing process, ultimately increasing their likelihood to recommend and reuse the service. The findings will also contribute to public information systems literature, serving as a valuable reference for similar service evaluations and optimizations in other government sectors

References

[1] Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Le, M. T. T., & Nguyen, N. L. (2023). E-government service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: Evidence from a newly emerging country. Journal of Public Policy, 43(4), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000296

[2] Noor, M. (2022). The effect of e-service quality on user satisfaction and loyalty in accessing e-government information. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 945–952. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.002

[3] Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Service Design and Citizen Satisfaction with E‐Government Services: A Multidimensional Perspective. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13308

[4] Hariguna, T., Ruangkanjanases, A., & Sarmini. (2021). Public Behavior as an Output of E-Government Service: The Role of New Technology Integrated in E-Government and Antecedent of Relationship Quality. Sustainability, 13(13), 7464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137464

[5] Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., & Dwivedi, Y. (2023). Clarifying the Role of E-Government Trust in E- Government Success Models: A Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 27. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4079

[6] Hidayat Ur Rehman, I., Ali Turi, J., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Alam, M. N., & Pilař, L. (2023). The role of awareness in appraising the success of E-government systems. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2186739. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2186739

[7] Fersellia, F., Utami, E., & Yaqin, A. (2023). Sentiment Analysis of Shopee Food Application User Satisfaction Using the C4.5 Decision Tree Method. Sinkron, 8(3), 1554–1563. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.12531

[8] Hidayat, R., Huda, M., & Pradita, N. (2024). Comparison Of The C4.5 And Naïve Bayes Algorithm For Recommendations For Aid Recipients For The Smart Indonesian Program. 5(1).

[9] Ikhsanti, A. Y., Fauziah, Y., & Perwira, R. I. (2021). Implementation of the c4.5 decision tree learning algorithm for sentiment analysis in e-commerce application reviews on google play store. Computing and Information Processing Letters, 1(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.31315/cip.v1i1.6128

[10] Nazifah, N. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Decision Tree Algoritma C4.5 dengan algoritma lainnya: Sistematic Literature Review. Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi Komputer (J-ICOM), 4(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.55377/j-icom.v4i2.7719

[11] Perwira, Y., Sitohang, A., Pandjaitan, M., & Simamora, K. (2023). Application of the Classification Decision Tree Method to Determine Student Satisfaction Factors for Student Services. 13(02).

[12] Naveed, Q. N., Alam, M. M., Qahmash, A. I., & Quadri, K. M. (2021). Exploring the Determinants of Service Quality of Cloud E-Learning System for Active System Usage. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4176. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094176

[13] Lubis, M. Z., Hartono, H., & Hayadi, B. H. (2023). Sentiment Classification on Twitter Social Media Using K-Means Clustering, C4.5 and Naive Bayes (Case Study: Blocking Paypal by Kominfo). International Conference on Information Science and Technology Innovation (ICoSTEC), 2(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.35842/icostec.v2i1.41

[14] Mahbooba, B., Timilsina, M., Sahal, R., & Serrano, M. (2021). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to Enhance Trust Management in Intrusion Detection Systems Using Decision Tree Model. Complexity, 2021(1),6634811. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6634811

[15] Nur Bhactiar, R. R., Hartanti, D., & Harsanto, H. (2023). Hybrid Decision Tree Method and C4.5 Algorithm for a Recommendation System in Determining Recipients of Direct Cash Assistance (BLT). Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High-Performance Computing, 5(2), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.47709/cnahpc.v5i2.2414

[16] Madyatmadja, E. D., Sianipar, C. P. M., Wijaya, C., & Sembiring, D. J. M. (2023). Classifying Crowdsourced Citizen Complaints through Data Mining: Accuracy Testing of K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and AdaBoost. Informatics, 10(4), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040084

[17] Mariani, N. W. R., & Sudjana, I. M. (2023). Classification of tourism business certification institution auditors based on the decision tree algorithm C4.5: Case study of LSUP. Jurnal Mantik, 7(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.35335/mantik.v7i1.3647

[18] Rahardja, U. (2022). Application of the C4.5 Algorithm for Identifying Regional Zone Status Using a Decision Tree in the Covid-19 Series. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 4(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v4i2.234

[19] Sinaga, T. H., Wanto, A., Gunawan, I., Sumarno, S., & Nasution, Z. M. (2021). Implementation of Data Mining Using C4.5 Algorithm on Customer Satisfaction in Tirta Lihou PDAM. Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture, and High-Performance Computing, 3(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.47709/cnahpc.v3i1.923.

[20] Rahmahwati, R., & Kirana, E. T. (2023). Implementation of C4.5 and K-Nearest Neighbor to Predict Palm Oil Fruit Production on Local Plantations. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7454–7461. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4498

[21] Vina Tri Putri Agil Purba & Fitriyani Fitriyani. (2024). Implementasi Algoritma C4.5 dalam Klasifikasi Calon Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Kelurahan Bah Sorma. Merkurius : Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika, 2(3), 72– 97. https://doi.org/10.61132/merkurius.v2i3.111

[22] Wati, E. F., Sudrajat, B., & Nasution, R. (2024). Modelling of C4.5 Algorithm for Graduation Classification. 8(158).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Putri, I. P., Marcelina, D., Yulianti, E., & Anandez, A. A. P. (2024). Service Quality Analysis of Business Licensing Information System (BLIS) at the Provincial Industry Department Using Decision Tree. Acceleration, Quantum, Information Technology and Algorithm Journal, 1(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.62123/aqila.v1i2.48

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.